The Search For Nuclear Happiness

By Meredith Angwin

This year, and especially during these long tomato-filled days of August, I have been thinking a lot about happiness. Actually, I have been thinking even more about unhappiness.

I am a nuclear advocate, and sometimes I find myself thinking, Why am I doing this nuclear activism thing? Do I like confrontation? Do I like it when I get a hate email?

NRC officials with police escort evacuate meeting in Brattleboro VT

Do I like to go to contentious Nuclear Regulatory Commission meetings where the NRC people are intimidated into leaving the room? Or to Vermont State Nuclear Advisory Panel meetings where opponents ask endless questions about nuclear safety? The answer is no. I don’t like to go to such meetings!

On a recent day, I found myself reading The Happiness Project by Gretchen Rubin. My daughter had recommended this book. As I was reading it, I was also receiving a series of accusatory emails from a plant opponent.

Quite a contrast in mental tone.

Not a contrast

Actually, it was not that much of a contrast. One of the points of The Happiness Project is that happiness doesn’t necessarily make you FEEL happy. This contradictory statement can be parsed as follows: The activities that are meaningful to a person, and lead to long-term happiness, are often stressful, hard, and anxiety-producing while they are happening. At the time you are doing them, happiness-producing activities do not necessarily make you feel happy.

Gretchen gave a simple example of how she began to discover this. A friend who is a gourmet cook was giving a dinner party. As he dashed around the kitchen, trying to do too many things at once, Gretchen asked him if he was “enjoying his own party?” He paused only briefly and answered that he would “enjoy it when it was over.”

So, why does he give the party? I mean, how is “enjoying it when it is over” different from “enjoying it by not doing it at all”? The answer is that cooking for friends is a major source of satisfaction for this man. The short-term stress of cooking leads to the long-term happiness of friendship and cheerful memories. It also leads to the happiness of being admired for the gourmet meals he creates.

I don’t want to try to summarize the book here, but it made me think about how to stay happy as a nuclear advocate. I came up with three ideas that work for me, and I thought I would share them.

Three routes to happiness as a nuclear advocate

First: Do something

Try to do something most days, even if it seems small. As Gretchen Rubin writes: We overestimate what we can accomplish in an hour or two, but we underestimate what we can accomplish by small efforts over time. Write enough letters to the editor, and you may be asked to write some op-eds. Once you have some op-eds printed, you can send op-eds to other newspapers and get wider publication. Organize a small meeting, or a big rally. There’s always something to do, and it doesn’t matter if it is big or small, or if you don’t do it perfectly, just as long as you do it.

Second: Work on curing the brownie deficit

Nuclear opponents tend to spend a lot of time together. They have potlucks, make costumes, have coffee and brownies in letter-writing groups. Pro-nuclear people have a brownie deficit; that is, a personal-interaction deficit. Try to cure it! Meet others in person whenever you can. I don’t know if I could do much for nuclear energy without the friendship of Howard Shaffer and my husband George Angwin. My female pro-nuclear friends tend to live farther afield, although I have developed a very close personal and pro-Vermont Yankee friendship with a woman in Brattleboro. It is over an hour’s drive between our houses, but we both think that getting together regularly is worthwhile, because personal friendships are important.

Yes, it is hard to get together, but humans were meant to get together. My best ideas don’t come from cogitation, they come from conversation. Don’t hide behind your computer. Get out there and cure the brownie deficit!

Third: Prioritize

Being a pro-nuclear activist means living in a “target-rich” environment. Every day, somebody will say or plan something ridiculous and anti-nuclear, and you want to answer them all. Every day, someone will ask for your help. You can’t do it all. Work on the situations where you have the most knowledge and the most credibility. Usually these are the events and talks that take place near your home. Prioritize! Time is your most precious commodity.

Another way to say that is to quote a friend of mine: “You don’t have to join every fight you’re invited to.”

The General Rule: Gratitude

My rules are specific to nuclear advocates, but I think there’s a general rule for increasing happiness that is true for everyone, in every circumstance.

Cultivate gratitude.

As a nuclear advocate, gratitude might mean appreciating your health (so you can be an advocate), appreciating your friends (so you aren’t alone in your advocacy), and appreciating your victories, however big or small. However, writing that list just for “nuclear advocates” feels much too petty. Advocate or not, I believe that gratitude helps everyone to happiness, to generosity, and to love.

In other words, being a nuclear advocate is just like being anyone else, and staying happy as a nuclear advocate uses the same techniques as anyone’s successful ”Happiness Project.”



Meredith Angwin is the founder of Carnot Communications, which helps firms to communicate technical matters. She specialized in mineral chemistry as a graduate student at the University of Chicago. Later, she became a project manager in the geothermal group at the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). Then she moved to nuclear energy, becoming a project manager in the EPRI nuclear division. She is an inventor on several patents.

Angwin serves as a commissioner in the Hartford Energy Commission, Hartford, Vt.  Angwin is a long-time member of the American Nuclear Society and coordinator of the Energy Education Project. She is a frequent contributor to the ANS Nuclear Cafe.


6 thoughts on “The Search For Nuclear Happiness

  1. Will Davis

    Agreeing with Dave; this article should be read by all of us on the pro-nuclear side and remembered. It’s the long haul that counts, not the bruises you get along the way!

  2. Milt Caplan

    Interesting post Meredith and keep up the good work. We need to keep spreading the message as well as taking the time to better understand where the opposing view is coming from. After reading both The Believing Brain by Michael Shermer and Future Babble by Dan Gardner, I realize that changing peoples’ minds is a huge challenge and takes long term commitment. The opponents to nuclear are just as committed to their beliefs as we are. You may be interested in my most recent post where I ask with strongly entrenched beliefs is anyone willing to change their mind?

  3. Meredith Angwin

    Thank you. I also admire Hargraves book THORIUM: energy cheaper than coal. As a matter of fact, I reviewed it on my blog this morning.
    However, if you think that the rise of thorium-based reactors will end anti-nuclear activism, I think you are mistaken. I am cheered by new builds and new reactor types, but I don’t think the opponents are going to go away.

    I agre! I am so grateful to have met you, Rod, Gwyneth, Jack and Jarret on our Bloggers Tour! On a day-to=day basis, I don’t like the hand-to-hand with opponents, so you and I are different in that regard. A typical interaction between me and an opponent has the opponent rapidly changing subjects as I answer each anti-nuke assertion. At the end, the opponent generally gives up the field with a parting insult. This pattern does not make a good drinking partner! You handle it better, I think, and I could learn from you!

  4. Steve Aplin

    Meredith, beautiful words. Nuclear advocacy is a thankless and annoying grind at times, but it is rewarding in just the ways you describe. I especially like your admonishment to cultivate gratitude. Every night I (try to remember to) thank the antis in Ontario, who have given me years of highly rewarding work. If not for them, I would not have acquired the (admittedly limited) knowledge of this fascinating field that I have picked up so far. At the very least, I would never have met you, Jack, Jarret, Gwyneth, and Rod.

    I have waged a small scale ground war here in Ontario, featuring a lot of close-in hand-to-hand with opponents over the past few years. Contrary to this description, I have enjoyed the encounters. I am in regular touch with many of these people, and I regularly have a drink with them. Preaching to the choir is nice, but I really enjoy the back-and-forth with opponents.

    Who knows what it will produce, beyond the also-highly-rewarding consulting work it has gotten me so far. But it sure is fun.


  5. Rod Clemetson

    Cheer up Meredith, help is on the way…

    Quoting Robert Hargraves in his book “Thorium: Energy Cheaper Than Coal” — “we can solve our global energy and environmental crises straightforwardly – through technology innovation and free-market economics. We need a disruptive technology – energy cheaper than coal. If we offer to sell to all the world the capability to produce energy that cheaply, all the world will stop burning coal. It’s as simple as that. Rely on the economic self-interest of 7 billion people in 250 nations to choose cheaper, nonpolluting energy.

    Energy is about 7% of the economy. We, and especially developing nations, can not afford to pay much more for energy. Many environmentalists advocate replacing fossil fuel energy with wind and solar energy sources, blind to the fact that these are 3-4 times more costly! Global economic prosperity requires lower energy costs, not higher costs from taxes or mandated costly wind and solar sources. THORIUM: energy cheaper than coal advocates lowering costs for clean energy – a market-based environmental solution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>