Dr. Chip Martin Wants To Save The World

By Chip Martin

N&D-congressional-fellow-apply-190x150Saving our planet. That’s the principal reason I applied to become the 2018 ANS Glenn T. Seaborg Nuclear Science and Engineering Policy Congressional Fellow.  After I applied, interviewed and was selected, I was invited to work in the office of Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D., Ohio’s 9th District), who is now in her 19th term in the U.S. House of Representatives.  Kaptur was honored late last year for becoming the longest-serving woman in the House.  This was a fortuitous pairing, as Congresswoman Kaptur is a longtime advocate for American energy independence and now chairs the Appropriation Committee’s Energy and Water Development Subcommittee. There was hardly an appointment that had more potential for me to learn the role of policy in our energy future.

I became very interested in the Glenn T. Seaborg Science and Engineering Congressional Fellowship back in 2000 when I learned about it.  The time was not right for me then, but a convergence of favorable conditions made the time right to apply in 2018.  I wanted to be a direct contributor to the federal policymaking process.

I understand that nuclear energy is relatively more expensive today because of cheap natural gas; however, nuclear is clean, reliable, and can provide power even when the sun or wind cannot.  The U.S. nuclear industry produces more power than any other country and is still the envy of the entire world.  Our safety record, per-megawatt generated, is better than any fossil or renewable energy.  This is the ‘elevator talk’ message that we need to hammer home in town hall meetings as well as the halls of Congress.

It’s unfortunate that the old saw says “a nuclear accident anywhere in the world affects nuclear power everywhere,” thus are the results with Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima.  In my opinion, U.S. involvement in power generation overseas is the best way to export our safety posture to minimize the likelihood of such accidents in the future.  And a vital nuclear industry in this country is critical to maintaining the technical base and engineering skills that underwrite our national security.  Congress must understand that if we forfeit our nuclear edge in the commercial sector, it will cut deeply across national security lines as well.

I am concerned that the critical decisions which will determine how we move forward with our energy mix are being decided by people with little experience with nuclear science or, indeed, any technical field. That is why public engagement is a vital skill that ANS needs to promote with its members and to exercise regularly.  America’s nuclear plants are at risk due to a combination of electricity markets focused on short-term spot prices, historically-low natural gas prices, and a lucrative assortment of federal and state subsidies for the construction and operation of renewable generation.  As a result, U.S. operators are beginning to shut down their nuclear plants prematurely. Half of the current fleet of U.S. nuclear generation is currently at risk despite the contribution that nuclear makes to carbon mitigation.

To address these issues, we need to clearly communicate the negative impact on the American public by the premature closure of nuclear power plants: loss of up to 60% of our carbon-free electricity generation; lower diversity of supply to the U.S. electrical grid; and significant negative economic impacts, including the loss of thousands of high-paying jobs, hundreds of millions of dollars in local tax payments, and secondary impacts that accrue to the communities which host these plants.

While my motives for seeking the fellowship were not particularly personal, I completed my year with the leverage to seek a full-time position on a Congressional staff or perhaps seek a position on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or even with the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.  At least two prior ANS fellows have taken full-time positions on committee or personal staffs in Congress.  My plans definitely include returning to the D.C. area and to help make a significant difference for the nuclear industry on behalf of climate change.

My goal as a Congressional Fellow was to connect science, especially nuclear science and technology, with policy and to build a network of science and engineering leaders who understand government and policymaking and are prepared to develop and execute solutions to address societal challenges. I think I succeeded beyond my wildest expectations, as the networking opportunities on the Hill are amazing. My portfolio during the fellowship year included nuclear security, especially with respect to balancing modernization needs with nonproliferation goals; cybersecurity as it relates to energy grids, election integrity, financial institutions, and warfare; transportation; and infrastructure reinvestment.

I also laid the groundwork for the creation of a university research and technology park in the Congresswoman’s district.  This initiative is intended to draw from several universities in her district with the goal of bringing high tech jobs into the area as well as retaining young scientists and engineers from elite Ohio universities in the region to fill those jobs.

Now back in Nevada, I hope to use the lessons learned from that effort to expand University of Nevada, Las Vegas’s efforts to attract high-tech companies and jobs to Southern Nevada.

So now, after leaving the Hill, I have seriously considered a run for the U.S. Congress (NV-04) in 2020, but personal considerations have made this option unlikely.  I might, however, work on the presidential campaign for one of the more pronuclear candidates in 2020; or I might eventually return to the Hill as a full-time staffer.  It’s safe to say that during my fellowship I contracted “Potomac Fever.”  I strongly believe that each of us in the nuclear science and technology field should consider running for office.  Even an unsuccessful campaign has the effect of bringing these ideas into the public discourse, which has great value given the ignorance of the public and our politicians regarding the benefits of this technology with respect to the energy policy choices we face.

As we collectively look to the future, I want the nuclear science and technology community to focus on how nuclear power can help solve our planet’s current existential challenge.  My next article for ANS Nuclear Cafe will lay out my perspective on a strategy for addressing this need.  Nuclear is critical to this problem – both the existing fleet and the next generation of designs.  But time is our enemy.  An encouraging development is that we have new friends in the green community, and many recent public policy evolutions are encouraging.  Stay tuned.


To learn more on how to apply to become the 2020 ANS Congressional Fellow, please visit the Society’s website. Deadline for applications is Wednesday, May 1, 2019.


 

Martin-CharlesDr. Charles R. “Chip” Martin is currently serving as a Distinguished Engineer at the Nevada National Security Site for the National Nuclear Security Agency.  He was the 2018 ANS Glenn T. Seaborg Science and Engineering Policy Fellow.  Prior, Dr. Martin was the Chief Nuclear Officer for Nevada National Security Site. He previously worked with the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force and the Department of Energy. He earned a Bachelor of Science in Nuclear Engineering from North Carolina State University and a Master of Science and Ph.D. in Nuclear Engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology.

Please feel free to leave a constructive comment for the author.

5 thoughts on “Dr. Chip Martin Wants To Save The World

  1. David Boyle

    Chip,
    Is that you? :-) Your short bio describes a person I used to know named Dr. Chip Martin, but the guy I knew back then was an active duty USAF officer, as was I. Were you? I think we are both getting old enough that we “don’t look like we used to.” So I can’t say for sure whether I see your 30-something year old face in that picture… Just wondering.
    Excellent article, by the way. I had always assumed those fellowships were for the youngsters, but you apparently did the job quite well. Congratulations on staying engaged in an important struggle, whether I know you or not.

  2. Susan Voss

    Chip
    thank you for your insights into your time as a Congressional Fellow. I think it is an excellent opportunity and I will consider it in the future. I think you would make a terrific Congressman and increase the understanding of nuclear power a thousand fold. Cheers!

  3. Ed DeLaney

    An inspiring message from Dr. Martin. Thanks for his commitment to nuclear energy and his intelligence to try to save it in the U.S.
    Since the current nuclear plant outlooks are so negative, we need to find a way to speed up the entry of the new designs, e.g. SMRs and MSRs. We must speed up the development process and the NRC approval process.

  4. Madan Dev

    Chip,
    Decades ago we spent billions of dollars to built an underground nuclear waste disposal facility in Nevada for permanent disposal of commercial and defense nuclear wastes. When the facility was ready to receive nuclear waste, the Nevada legislators bannned any nuclear waste coming to the site. Also, since the Three Mile Island accident, all the new nuclear plants on the drawing board have been canceled, and everyday we hear about the old operating nuclear plants, sooner or later, are in the process of being shut down, for good. In the last ANS Annual meeting, 2018, I learnt that China has something like 400 nuclear plants on the nation’s drawing board. Seems like we’re losing our stake in Nuclear science and technology. Undoubtedly, majority of our nation’s politicians are very self-centered and their focus is on their personal rather than national interest and its future.

  5. gmax@137

    Chip, please reconsider running for congress in Nevada. I moved to NV a few years ago and I have to say I am surprised and disappointed by the positions taken by our governor and senators on nuclear matters. They appear to be ignorant of the technological issues as well as the historic contributions made in Nevada over the past 70 years. Their agenda is fear mongering and patronizing “easy votes.”. This state deserves better.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>