Understanding the legacy of the “Atom for Peace” speech

By Pierre-Clément Simon

What to expect from this article: (4 minutes read)

  • Get a reminder about the context of the “Atom for Peace” speech
  • Learn about the main positive consequences and the shortcomings and of the speech
  • Find resources to go further

An unprecedented and threatening context:

The Atom for Peace symbol [1]

The Atom for Peace symbol [1]

On December 8, 1953, President Dwight D. Eisenhower gave a speech to the UN General Assembly in New York entitled “Atom for Peace”. [2,3] This speech was a tipping point for the peaceful use of atomic power. Today, 66 years later, we will attempt to summarize its contested legacy.

“I feel impelled to speak today in a language that in a sense is new, one which I, […] would have preferred never to use.That new language is the language of atomic warfare.”-President Dwight D. Eisenhower

In 1953, atomic power is not exclusive to the United States anymore. The Soviet Union already tested several nuclear bombs. Among them, at least one thermo-nuclear bomb [2].

President Dwight D. Eisenhower is conscious of both the dangers and promises of atomic power. On one hand, he acknowledges the increasing risk of nuclear proliferation and the threat of mutual destruction from atomic warfare. On the other hand, he recognizes the immense potential of peaceful use of nuclear energy.

As such, in his speech, the president declares: “…the United States pledges before you, and therefore before the world, its determination to help solve the fearful atomic dilemma – to devote its entire heart and mind to finding the way by which the miraculous inventiveness of man shall not be dedicated to his death, but consecrated to his life.”-President Dwight D. Eisenhower

Positive consequences of the speech:

1) Creation of international agreements

“The governments principally involved […], should begin now and continue to make joint contributions from their stockpiles of normal uranium and fissionable materials to an international atomic energy agency […].

The more important responsibility of this atomic energy agency would be to devise methods whereby this fissionable material would be allocated to serve the peaceful pursuits of mankind.” -President Dwight D. Eisenhower

The “Atom for Peace” speech described the framework for the creation of several international treaties and agencies. Among them, the International Atomic Energy Agency and the treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear weapons. The IAEA never became a weapon-grade materials bank, but still had a tremendous effect on non-proliferation and the development of peaceful nuclear energy (learn more in [4]).

2) Development of peaceful nuclear

“The United States knows that if the fearful trend of atomic military build-up can be reversed, this greatest of destructive forces can be developed into a great boon, for the benefit of all mankind.”- President Dwight D. Eisenhower

This speech led to the creation of a multitude of peaceful nuclear programs across the world, benefiting mankind in energy production, medicine, and many other fields [5].

3) Democratization of the discussion around nuclear power

“If the peoples of the world are to conduct an intelligent search for peace, they must be armed with the significant facts of today’s existence.” -President Dwight D. Eisenhower

After this speech, atomic power ceased to be exclusively a secret matter of the state to become a global challenge for every citizen of the world. The Atom for Peace program launched soon after supported the development of nuclear research to civilians and countries that did not have previous access to nuclear power.

Shortcomings of the speech

1) This speech did not prevent the nuclear arm-race that followed.

“…two atomic Colossi are doomed malevolently to eye each other indefinitely across a trembling world” -President Dwight D. Eisenhower

Unfortunately, the President predicted the fear the world would live under during the rest of the cold war between the United States and the Soviet Union.

2) Some programs that were launched after the speech might have contributed to proliferation.

“First, the knowledge now possessed by several nations will eventually be shared by others, possibly all others.” -President Dwight D. Eisenhower

Despite the president’s desire and efforts to limit the proliferation of military nuclear power, some argue that programs put in place after the “Atom for Peace” speech initiated the development of nuclear military programs in some countries. Ariana Rowberry, for example, described how the well-intended Atom for Peace program might have contributed to the subsequent development of Iran’s nuclear weapons program (learn more in [6])

Closing remarks

The” Atom for Peace” speech was a turning point in the international discussion around atomic power.

In this short story, we discussed the positive consequences of the “Atom for Peace” speech, as well as some of its shortcomings. It democratized nuclear power and laid the ideological foundations for international agencies and bodies for the development of peaceful use of nuclear energy. This development improved the condition of mankind thanks to the production of clean and plentiful electricity, as well as improvements in medicine, space propulsion, and plenty of other technological advancements.

In essence, the “Atom for Peace” speech was a call for international unity in an ambiguous time of unprecedented danger and immense opportunities. Today, as the world faces the reality of climate change, it is important we remember these words of President Eisenhower:

“…if a danger exists in the world, it is a danger shared by all; and equally, that if hope exists in the mind of one nation, that hope should be shared by all.”

Read the entire speech.

References:
[1] OECD historical series, United states Atomic Energy Commission – http://www.eurochemic.be/nl/documents/68-eurochemic-EN.pdf page 52. 1996
[2] Atom for Peace speech, IAEA. https://www.iaea.org/about/history/atoms-for-peace-speech
[3] Draft of presidential speech before the general assembly of the United Nations. https://www.dwightdeisenhower.com/DocumentCenter/View/2278/Atoms-for-Peace-Draft-PDF?bidId=
[4] IAEA https://www.iaea.org/about/overview
[5] Atom for Peace, IKE Eisenhower Foundation. https://www.dwightdeisenhower.com/378/Atoms-for-Peace
[6] Ariana Rowberry ‘Sixty years of “Atom for Peace” and Iran’s Nuclear Program’, Brookings, 2013. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2013/12/18/sixty-years-of-atoms-for-peace-and-irans-nuclear-program/


Pierre-Clément SimonPierre-Clément Simon is a Ph.D. candidate in nuclear engineering at Pennsylvania State University where he works with Prof. Arthur Motta (ANS Fellow). He is the vice-president of the local Alpha Nu Sigma chapter. He is also an ANS member and part of the ANS Social Media Team. He invites you to connect with him on LinkedIn.

3 thoughts on “Understanding the legacy of the “Atom for Peace” speech

  1. Pierre-Clément Simon

    As a student in Nuclear Engineering at Penn State, I am always amazed by the passion with which more experienced alumni share the incredible history of the program.

    After publishing this short article, I received an email from Prof. Forrest Remick, former Penn State Nuclear Engineering Faculty, and one of the Department’s founders (among many other impressive positions). In his email, he was describing the International School for Nuclear Science and Engineering (ISNSE), which was conducted at Penn State, NC State and Argonne National Lab for foreign scientists and engineers, which I, unfortunately, did not know much about and did not mention in my article.

    I want to thank him for sharing this information with me, and I want in turn to share it with you here as a perfect example of the programs that were created after the speech:

    ‘In April 1956, about the time that the Penn State Reactor was achieving routine operation, Penn State along with North Carolina State College entered into a cooperative arrangement with the Atomic Energy Commission and the Argonne National Laboratory to establish the International School of Nuclear Science and Engineering (ISNSE) whereby scientists from other countries were able to spend a semester in resident training at Penn State (or at North Carolina State) and then go to Argonne for four months of additional training. Dr. Warren W. Miller, Professor of Chemistry served as Director of the ISNSE program at Penn State and members of the reactor staff taught courses in this program. This program was carried on until January 1959 at which time the number of students decreased to a number small enough so that the continuation of the program at the two universities was no longer warranted. At the suggestion of Penn State, the program was consolidated at North Carolina State. As a part of this program. 175 students from 39 countries studied at Penn State and have gone on to hold responsible positions in their respective countries.’

  2. Bob Albrecht

    I owe my career in nuclear engineering to the AEC “special fellowships” created as a consequence of Eisenhower’s initiative. I tell anyone who might be interested how much I am grateful for Ike’s program.

  3. Bob Albrecht

    I owe my career in nuclear engineering to the AEC “special fellowships” created as a consequence of Eisenhower’s initiative I tell anyone who might be interested how much I am grateful for Ike’s program.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>