Category Archives: Meetings

The ANS Young Professionals Congress 2011 – follow on Twitter!

By Peter Caracappa

 We are just a few days away from the 2011 Young Professionals Congress, taking place during the ANS Winter Meeting next week in Washington, DC. We have many exciting and informative sessions scheduled for the meeting—informational sessions on important current topics, workshops, and interactive skills sessions (to find out more, see Nuclear Cafe posts 9-21 and  8-30).

We will open with a bang on Monday afternoon at the YPC plenary, and sessions will run all day Tuesday and Wednesday. Tuesday evening will feature the YPC social, and Thursday will include a visit to the Hill with representatives in the US Congress (for those that signed up at pre-registration).

We hope that those attending the ANS winter meeting will be able to participate in many of the YPC sessions—but of course, we understand if you are occasionally drawn away by some of the excellent sessions in the meeting proper. And we know how many people would like to participate, but won’t be able to make it to Washington this time around.

So how to keep track of all the goings-on? The best way to follow the happenings, if you are in Washington or not, is through the #YPC2011 hash-tag on twitter. No, it won’t be the same as being there, but you will be able to catch some of the highlights from the featured speakers and workshop sessions. We will also be soliciting twitter input to the “Challenges Facing the Young Generation in Nuclear” session on Wednesday afternoon.

Remember, #YPC2011 for all your Young Professionals Congress info! See you soon.

____________

Caracappa

Peter Caracappa is a clinical assistant professor and radiation safety officer at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, in New York State. He is General Chair of the ANS NA-YGN Young Professionals Congress and is a regular contributor to the ANS Nuclear Cafe

ANS president Eric Loewen visits The City College of New York

Eric Loewen, president of the American Nuclear Society, on October 13 visited the new ANS Student Section at The City College of New York (CCNY). Loewen presented talks on “Fukushima and the Role of Past Severe Accident Research” and “The American Nuclear Society President’s Special Committee on Used Nuclear Fuel Management Options” to an audience of more than 50 faculty members and students. (Loewen’s previous visit to CCNY, in February 2011, is detailed here).

“President Loewen’s return to The City College of New York was another highly anticipated and popular event,” said Charles Sosa, president of the CCNY student section. “The positive response was enormous and encouraged a number of students to enroll in our reactor physics course for the coming spring semester!”

From left, Matthew Rich (vice president), Ignacio Garca (treasurer), Masahiro Kawaji (faculty advisor), Eric Loewen, Charles Sosa (president), and Fahad Chaudhury (treasurer)

In addition, Loewen presented the CCNY student section with its ANS certificate of inauguration. About 30 students are members of the new group. “We as a student section are steadfast in our commitment to educating our local student population on the benefits of nuclear technology for peaceful applications, and hosting President Loewen is an important part of that commitment to education,” said Sosa. “The section expresses its gratitude for his informative, engaging, and fact-driven presentations on topics that are often misrepresented and therefore controversial.”

Loewen, when asked about the visit, said, “The vitality of our professional society is demonstrated by our active student sections, and nothing shows the promise of nuclear science and technology more than events like this one. The students at CCNY are so committed to the community and to ANS that they formed this new chapter, and I’m proud that one of my duties as president is to welcome them to the society.”

Loewen the following day visited and presented to the ANS Student Section at the United States Military Academy at West Point—his fourth visit to student groups since taking over the presidency in June this year (press release). It was his first visit as ANS president to a service academy, where he was able to meet with students in the academy’s newly-inaugurated nuclear engineering program.

The Rally for Vermont Yankee: At the Plant Gates During the Refueling Outage

By Meredith Angwin

The Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant is undergoing a refueling outage. For most plants, the situation would be business as usual.  The state of Vermont, however, believes it has the power to shut down Vermont Yankee in March 2012, even though the plant has a 20-year license extension from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. In order to continue operations at Vermont Yankee, Entergy (the plant’s owner and operator) has sued the state.

In these uncertain circumstances, it was unclear whether or not Vermont Yankee would buy and load fuel in October. A decision to load fuel would mean that Entergy might lose tens of millions of dollars if the plant is actually shut down in March. Entergy’s other choice was closing the plant in October, which would mean job losses, rising electricity prices, and increased air pollution in Vermont.

The company made a choice to keep the plant running, even amidst uncertainty. Entergy is loading fuel right now at Vermont Yankee, which is a true vote of confidence in nuclear power!

Motivation for the Rally

We decided to show our support for Entergy’s decision and for all the workers at the refueling. Howard Shaffer and I planned a pro-nuclear rally that would take place right at the gates of the plant during shift change. We wanted the workers to see that people support them! Here’s a quote from the press release about the rally:

“The people working the outage will appreciate our support,” said co-organizer Howard Shaffer, coordinator of the Vermont Pilot Project of the American Nuclear Society. “We are grateful to Entergy for giving us permission to be at the Governor Hunt House for the rally.”

(The Governor Hunt House is right outside the gates of the plant. The last lieutenant governor of the independent Republic of Vermont built the house in 1789. Vermont Yankee owns the house, and uses it for some meetings and press conferences.)

Planning and Hoping

Howard and I planned thoroughly, as usual. We sent a press release. We sent e-mails to lists of people, inviting them to come. I put the rally on my blog and on the Save Vermont Yankee Facebook page. Howard sent a practical e-mail with directions to the plant and recommendations for dressing for the weather. He stressed the importance of wearing sturdy-soled shoes for standing on damp grass. We did everything we could to make the rally a success.

We had held a rally before, early in the morning of the first day of the Entergy/Vermont trial. At that rally, we had 25 people, a good showing, and reporters noted that both opponents and supporters of the plant were present. (I blogged about this rally at ANS Nuclear Cafe). We hoped to have an equally successful rally this time.

Going Viral

Instead, this rally  “went viral.” About 25 people had said they would come. Instead, there were about 60 people! People told their friends. People brought their kids. One man of 92 years came to support the plant.  (He is sitting on the bench in the photo.) One couple came down from Vermont’s Champlain Islands. A man who owns the local tavern came with his son. Among all these people, I met some who I had previously met only on Facebook, and I met their kids, too! Two documentary filmmakers interviewed Howard, and one interviewed me. The people at the plant were very happy, honking, and waving at us. “Nuke Roadie” (look up his Facebook page) was there and posted pictures of the rally on his page. The plant posted great pictures of the rally on the Vermont Yankee Facebook page.  (I include some of those pictures here, by permission.)

The people holding signs at the rally were happy and inspired. The people working at the plant were happy and inspired by our presence. The whole thing was a great deal of fun! Even the weather was perfect.

An article that appeared in the Brattleboro Reformer newspaper was very positive about the event.  Since the supporters came and went during the rally, however, the article stated there were thirty people. Actually, there were about twice that many.

Lessons Learned

What are some of the lessons learned from this rally? Well, the rally was yesterday, and we haven’t quite digested all the lessons yet, but here are some:

  • Organizations grow. Success at one rally helps build success at the next one. People tell their friends.
  • Afternoon rallies are better than rallies that start at 7:30 a.m., at least in terms of getting people to show up. (Yeah, this is obvious…)
  • Some rallies let people stand up for nuclear in a potentially confrontational situation (our first rally). On the other hand, sometimes it’s great just to be among friends!

This pro-nuclear rally was a great evening amongst friends!

We are grateful to everyone who attended. We are grateful to the workers who honked and waved at us and gave us thumbs-up signals. We are grateful to Entergy for allowing us onto their property, and providing the Governor Hunt House with snacks and coffee.

As one woman said as she was leaving the Governor Hunt House, “This was a real nice clambake, and we all had a real good time!”

Angwin

Meredith Angwin is the founder of Carnot Communications, which helps firms to communicate technical matters. She specialized in mineral chemistry as a graduate student at the University of Chicago. Later, she became a project manager in the geothermal group at the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). Then she moved to nuclear energy, becoming a project manager in the EPRI nuclear division. She is an inventor on several patents.

Angwin serves as a commissioner in the Hartford Energy Commission, Hartford, Vt.  Angwin is a long-time member of the American Nuclear Society and coordinator of the Energy Education Project. She is a frequent contributor to the ANS Nuclear Cafe.

Social Media Meet Up at ANS Winter Meeting

ANS Social Media Meet Up November 1 at ANS Winter Conference

A meet-up of people attending the ANS Winter Meeting in Washington, DC, interested in the use of social media in the nuclear industry will be held Tuesday, November 1, from 6:30-8:30 PM in the Congressional “A” meeting room at the Omni Shoreham hotel. This is the conference hotel for the ANS meeting. (Google Map) (Red Line: Woodley Park-Zoo)

The ANS Public Information Committee is the official host of the social media meet up. There is no registration or cost to attend the social media meeting, which takes place after hours of the regular ANS conference sessions. Food and beverages will be available.

Sponsors

This conference social media meeting is made possible by the generous support of our sponsors:

  • AREVA North America
  • Nuclear Energy Institute

This will be the fourth time such a meeting has been held. Prior meetings have been at ANS meetings in Hollywood, Fla. (June 2011), Las Vegas, Nev. (November 2010), and in Washington, DC, (November 2009).

Meeting agenda

The agenda for the meeting on November 1 starts at 6:30 PM. There will be additional time at the end of the agenda for personal interchange with meeting participants.

6:30 PM  ~ Meet & Greet with drinks & light refreshments

7:00 PM ~ Call to Order

  • Welcome – Laura Scheele, ANS
  • Introduction of Sponsors – Dan Yurman
  • NEI Welcome – Eric McErlain
  • AREVA Welcome – Jarret Adams

7:15 PM ~ AREVA: Presentation on a new social media application for smart phones to improve communication and productivity

7:45 PM ~ Q&A

8:00 PM ~ Facilitated round table discussion – Dan Yurman

8:30 PM ~ Informal small group or one-on-one discussions

Conference sessions on communications

Note that there are two sessions on communications, advocacy, and social media taking place on Monday afternoon, October 31. There will be an additional session on government relations on Wednesday afternoon. See the ANS conference program for details. You must be registered for the conference to attend these panels.

Please share this message with your friends and colleagues or post it on your blog.

Contacts

· AREVA

Jarret Adams
Media Relations
Tel: 301-841-1695
Email: jarret.adams@AREVA.com
Blog: AREVA North America: Next Energy Blog

http://us.AREVAblog.com/

· Nuclear Energy Institute

Steve Kerekes
Media Relations
Nuclear Energy Institute
Tel: 202-739-8073
Email: sck@nei.org
Blog: NEI Nuclear Notes
http://neinuclearnotes.blogspot.com/

· American Nuclear Society

Laura Scheele
Manager, Communications & Policy
American Nuclear Society
Tel: 708-579-8224
Email: lschele@ans.org
Blog: ANS Nuclear Cafe
http://ansnuclearcafe.org

Dan Yurman
Consultant
Cell: 208-521-5726
Email: djysrv@gmail.com
Blog: Idaho Samizdat
http://djysrv.blogspot.com

# # #

Samples from NRC Webcasts (First of a Series)

by E. Michael Blake

For a while in the early 1990s, my work at Nuclear News magazine included coverage of Washington, D.C.  Eight or ten times a year, I’d spend two or three days in our nation’s capital, attending congressional hearings, interviewing bigwigs, pestering agencies to give me copies of arcane documents, and frantically taking notes in public meetings at the headquarters of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Two decades later, much of that scurrying around is no longer necessary, in large part because many NRC meetings can be accessed by phone or internet.  This is fortunate, because in recent months the commissioners and staffers have held several public sessions of substantial importance, and this reporter has been able to watch them from his office as a normal workday activity (reducing both the cost to the American Nuclear Society and the travel-related aggravation of the reporter).

The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in 2002

Many of the high-profile meetings this year have had to do with the NRC’s effort to learn from the Fukushima Daiichi accident in Japan, or with the first few new reactor projects to reach the brink of receiving combined construction and operating licenses (COL). Nuclear News does not have room, nor do its readers likely have time, for all of what goes on at all of these events.

Here at the ANS Nuclear Cafe, however, it may be possible from time to time to mention isolated moments that don’t make it through to detailed coverage in the magazine. Because Fukushima Daiichi and new reactors will remain important issues for quite a while, it seems safe to conclude that this sort of webcast sampling will become a series here on the blog. And so it begins:

Jaczko

• In an August 30 commission meeting on the development of inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC) for new power reactors, Chairman Gregory Jaczko stated early on that he had previously not looked closely at any ITAACs, and that he found the first one that he’d read carefully to be “surprisingly vague,” and that he didn’t think this “bodes well for our ability to work through these issues.”

Jaczko returned to the point often during the meeting. The ITAAC concerned the waterproof membranes and mudmats for the nuclear island foundations at Southern Nuclear Operating Company’s Vogtle-3 and -4; Jaczko asked whether the ITAAC’s statement—that the mudmat’s coefficient of friction will be tested—describes adequately what will be done by the applicant, how it would be examined by the NRC, and what would have to happen next if the goal is not met.

The chairman’s statements contrasted with the presentation of Laura Dudes, director of the division of construction inspection and operational programs in the agency’s Office of New Reactors, who said in her prepared remarks that ITAACs are a “good news story,” but later conceded (as did other speakers from the staff) that not all ITAACs thus far have been written as clearly and as objectively as perhaps they should have been; the staffers said that they’d work on this some more. Dudes did affirm, however, that every aspect of the work covered by an ITAAC would be inspected against the plant’s licensing basis, so there would not be an issue of the NRC not fulfilling its mission or allowing any unsafe practices to exist.

• Both the NRC and the Nuclear Energy Institute have recently referred to being guided, in their efforts to learn lessons from Fukushima Daiichi and to respond accordingly, by “living documents.” On the charter proposed for the NRC’s Long-Term Task Force on the accident in Japan, the staff told the commissioners in an August 26 paper that the charter would “live” in the sense that the staff would change it as needed, if information gleaned from the recovery of Fukushima Daiichi indicated that different lines of inquiry should be pursued. During a September 21 meeting with NRC staffers, industry representatives said that their own guidance document, titled The Way Forward, is intended to “live” as well, and for essentially the same reason: to keep open all options until after the damaged reactors have reached cold shutdown and more detailed examinations can be carried out by Japanese experts.

Apostolakis

• On September 14, the staff briefed the commissioners on the latter’s request for input on which of the recommendations from the Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) report on the Fukushima Daiichi accident should be acted upon without delay. One of the proposed actions is for information requests to be sent to current power reactor licensees to develop and carry out seismic and flooding walkdowns at their reactors. Commissioner George Apostolakis looked at the request for licensees to develop acceptance criteria for the process, and asked, “Don’t we know how to do walkdowns?” Martin Virgilio, NRC deputy executive director for reactor and preparedness programs, replied, “I would have thought so until I had a discussion with Jack Grobe,” a member of the NTTF. Because the walkdowns will be related to response to events beyond a reactor’s design basis, acceptance criteria must be developed and agreed upon by the licensee and the NRC, before these walkdowns can be carried out.

________

Blake

E. Michael Blake is a senior editor of the American Nuclear Society’s Nuclear News magazine.

Do you have your Radwaste Solutions?

Just a reminder that the September/October issue of Radwaste Solutions is available in hard copy and electronically for American Nuclear Society members (must enter ANS user name and password in Member Center). The issue is devoted to environmental remediation, and contains the following feature articles:

  • Getting Remediation Done at ORNL
  • Enhanced “Interrogation” Techniques: Soil Contamination Imaging at Hanford
  • From Test Site to Wildlife Refuge: Tatum Salt Dome Test Site Transferred to State
  • Permeable Reactive Barriers: Advancing Natural In-Situ Remediation for Treatment of Radionuclides in Groundwater
  • Groundwater Restoration at the La Rosita In-Situ Uranium Recovery Project
  • It’s Complicated: The Complexities of Decommissioning a Uranium Mine Site

Other items of note in the issue include the following reports:

  • Draft Report from the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future—Executive Summary
  • Report of the American Nuclear Society’s President’s Special Committee on Used Nuclear Fuel Management Options—Executive Summary

The issue also contains a meeting report titled, “Very Long Term Dry Storage—and Other Issues,” which deals with information collected during a session at the ANS 2011 Annual Meeting in June, and much more.

Past issues of Radwaste Solutions are available here.

____________

Webinar with NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko takes place TODAY

REMINDER:

The online webinar for nuclear bloggers—an unscripted question-and-answer session with NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko— will take place on Tuesday, October 4, 2011, from 11 AM–12 Noon Eastern Time.

The webinar registration link is:

https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/208508233

For those unable to hook up by computer, the toll-free line to listen is: 888-469-3064 (passcode: 33572).

Full details are below.

__________________________________________________

A first-of-a-kind event for the Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Gregory Jaczko NRC March 2011The American Nuclear Society, in coordination with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), has announced a live online webinar for nuclear bloggers on Tuesday, October 4, 2011, from 11 AM–12 Noon Eastern Time.

The webinar will be an unscripted question-and-answer session with NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko (above).

Jaczko is participating in order to broaden the NRC’s outreach with the nuclear social media community. A similar one-hour session will be held on October 6 with representatives of organizations who are critical of and/or oppose nuclear energy. (ANS will not be involved with the October 6 event.)

How to submit questions

Participants in the October 4 session will be able to submit questions ahead of time by using this NRC e-mail address: BlogMtg1.Resource@nrc.gov

Nuclear bloggers: Please mark your calendar for Oct. 4 from 11 a.m.-Noon EDT for an opportunity to submit questions to NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko and hear his responses.

The conference call webinar will be listen-only. We are soliciting questions both through a dedicated email account at the NRC in advance and taking emailed questions online via the webinar while the discussion is in progress. The session will be archived for later listening as a podcast available for download or listening on the NRC website. For those who would like to prime the pump, the email address to submit a question in advance is: BlogMtg1.Resource@NRC.gov

Free Registration

The webinar registration link is: https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/208508233 

For those unable to hook up by computer, the toll-free line to listen is: 888-469-3064 (passcode: 33572 )

Audio will be available through the web link for those persons using speakers or headphones.

Post session Podcast & Blog Posts

While Jaczko will likely be unable to answer all of the questions submitted in the time available, Eliot Brenner, chief of NRC Public Affairs, said, “The agency will endeavor to address them online after the webinar via its blog at: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov/“   The complete recorded session will be available as a Podcast from the NRC website.

Time will also be allocated to answering questions submitted by participants via an online form on the webinar website. Those without web access will be able to dial in to listen to the webinar via a toll-free telephone line, but will not be able to submit questions by phone.

Focus of discussion

The focus of the session will be on policy issues and the broad regulatory and safety objectives of the NRC. Questions that are most likely to be selected for the live session will be those that have broad public interest in terms of the NRC’s mission.

“The NRC will answer any detailed technical questions about specific nuclear plant systems on its blog. Also, if we see a similar question submitted by several participants, we’ll ask a composite question,” Brenner said.

ANS Facilitator

Dan YurmanLaura Scheele, ANS manager for Communications & Policy, said that the NRC session will be facilitated by Dan Yurman (right), a nuclear blogger, on behalf of ANS.

He is a member of the American Nuclear Society and serves on the organization’s Public Information Committee. Yurman will be on site at NRC headquarters for the session.

Scheele noted that support from the elected officers of ANS was essential in organizing the October 4 event. The officers include Eric Loewen, ANS president; Mike Corradini, vice-president /president elect, and Joe Colvin, immediate past president.

The announcement above is also available on the ANS website.

# # #

ANS to hold teacher workshop in Washington, DC

The American Nuclear Society’s Public Education Program will be sponsoring a one-day teacher workshop on Saturday, October 29, in Washington, DC. The workshop—Detecting Radiation in Our Radioactive World—is intended for science educators (including biology, chemistry, earth science, physics, physical science, life science, environmental, and general science teachers) at the high school and middle school levels. The workshop will be held prior to the ANS Winter Conference, October 30–November 3, 2011.

The following video provides an overview of ANS’s role in sponsoring teacher workshops and features footage from interviews conducted during the June 2011 ANS Teachers Workshop, held in Hollywood, Fla.

The full-day workshop will prepare attendees to teach the basics about radiation, how we detect radiation, and the uses of nuclear science and technology in society. Teachers who complete the workshop will receive a wealth of materials—background information, hands-on activities, and supplementary resources—and a Geiger counter. Career opportunities in nuclear science and technology will be highlighted during the sessions.

“We’re excited to be offering this overview of radiation and nuclear science to teachers in the Washington, DC area,” said Chuck Vincent, ANS Outreach administrator. “Workshop participants are always eager to receive their free Geiger counters and learn about hands-on demonstrations that they can use in their classrooms.”

Currently, scheduled presenters include:

  • Peter Caracappa, radiation safety officer/clinical assistant professor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  • Candace Davison, senior reactor operator and educational specialist, Breazeale Reactor, Penn State University
  • Mary Lou Dunzik-Gougar, assistant professor of nuclear engineering, Idaho State University, and research scientist at Idaho National Laboratory
  • Eric P. Loewen, president–American Nuclear Society, chief engineer–General Electric, Wilmington, N.C.

There is a $75 nonrefundable registration fee for teachers to reserve a place at the workshop. The registration deadline is 12:00 noon (Central Time), Monday, October 17, 2011. Please visit the ANS website for more information, including an announcement and online registration form. The workshop will be limited in size to optimize interaction with presenters. Registration is on a first-come first-served basis.

______________

2011 Young Professionals Congress – Coming Soon!

By Peter Caracappa

The 2011 Young Professionals Congress (YPC 2011) is coming, and the time to register is now! YPC 2011 is an embedded topical of the American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting in Washington, DC, October 30–November 3, 2011. YPC2011 is the fourth YPC, and the second to be held as an embedded topical in parallel with the ANS Winter Meeting.

The YPC is jointly organized by the Young Members Group of ANS and the North American Young Generation in Nuclear (NA-YGN) to provide a forum for young professionals from across the nuclear industry to come together to discuss the challenges facing the next generation of nuclear professionals. Within this venue, young professionals have the opportunity to develop nontechnical professional skills, network among their peers, and explore the roles and functions of industry organizations such as ANS and NA-YGN.

The YPC has a full program beginning on the Monday afternoon of the meeting. Some of the exciting sessions planned include:

  • The Hacker Within: Scientific Computing Tutorial—A special demonstration from the University of Wisconsin, which has developed a series of short courses to provide time-efficient introductions to essential programming languages and tools without trying to turn engineers into computer scientists.
  • The Front of the Room—Tools, techniques, and strategies for effective presentations.
  • The Power of Storytelling—A creative session on knowledge transfer, focusing on an introduction to critical listening and critical question asking skills.
  • Challenges Facing the Young Generation in Nuclear—An interactive session that will build upon the outcomes of each previous YPC to develop a detailed list of recommendations and actions to better meet the needs of young nuclear science and technology professionals and their employers. Session participants will develop recommendations through small-group, moderator-led discussions.
  • …and more!

Registration for the YPC is part of the registration for the ANS Winter meeting. Meeting registration is discounted for ANS members who have not yet reached the age of 36, or are less than five years into their career after graduation. Online registration, as well as full program information, can be found at the ANS website.

Caracappa

Peter Caracappa is a clinical assistant professor and radiation safety officer at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, in New York State. He was a founding executive committee member of the Young Members Group and currently serves as its chair. He is a contributor to the ANS Nuclear Cafe.

September 2011 Nuclear News is online

The September issue of Nuclear News is available in hard copy and electronically for American Nuclear Society members (must enter ANS user name and password in Member Center). The issue contains a variety of features, including:

  • An interview with Cliff Hamal, of Navigant Economics, on the expected cost increase in the coming decades of storing spent nuclear fuel at retired reactor sites.
  • A look at the Blue Ribbon Commission’s draft recommendations for spent fuel management.
  • Insights from the Fukushima Daiichi accident: Comments on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s near-term task force report.
  • An in-depth review of ANS’s 2011 annual meeting, which was held in Hollywood, Fla.

Hanford workers load a mixed LLW container onto a shipping platform.

Other news items in the September issue deal with: an NRC staff memo that addresses small modular reactor staffing issues; the summer heat that led to power level reductions at nuclear power plants; the commercial start of Watts Bar-2 being officially delayed until 2013; the NRC’s extending the time to apply for NFPA 805 amendments; the seismic studies scheduled for Diablo Canyon’s license renewal; the draft environmental impact statement issued for Seabrook’s renewal; U.S. Department of Homeland Security, European Commission teaming up to enhance security; first applications submitted for new reactor construction in United Kingdom; U.K. energy market reforms aim to attract nuclear investment; Sellafield MOX fuel plant closing as demand dips; Japan’s prime minister’s call for a nuclear phaseout; the arrival of the world’s first AP1000 reactor pressure vessel in China; the tsunami countermeasures planned for Japan’s Hamaoka nuclear station; India’s signing of a cooperation agreement with South Korea; the completion of a retubing project at South Korea’s Wolsong-1; the Department of Energy beating of deadlines for dealing with transuranic and mixed waste at the Hanford Site; investors extend deadline for USEC to obtain a DOE loan guarantee for the American Centrifuge Plant; the DOE awards $39 million for university-led nuclear R&D; and more.

Past issues of Nuclear News are available here.

____________

ANS Winter Meeting is coming

It’s time to make plans to attend the American Nuclear Society‘s 2011 Winter Meeting and Nuclear Technology Expo, this year held in Washington, DC, on October 30–November 3 at the Omni Shoreham Hotel.

The theme of the meeting is “The Status of Global Nuclear Deployment.” In addition to regular technical sessions throughout the week, the meeting will include the inaugural ANS Small Modular Reactor Conference and also the Young Professionals Congress 2011.

Highlights of the meeting include the ANS president’s reception, professional development workshops, technical sessions, and tours of some of the city’s many attractions.

The meeting’s preliminary program is available online at the ANS website. Information available at the site includes:

  • Online registration
  • Student assistant online application
  • Advance meeting registration form
  • Hotel reservation form
  • Sponsors
  • ANS paper review
  • Application for student assistants
  • Student assistant hotel reservation instructions

Hope to see you in Washington, DC!

Fukushima on Young Members’ agenda

By Elia Merzari

The American Nuclear Society’s Young Members Group, with the help of ANS’s Nuclear Installation Safety Division, is organizing a panel session at the Young Professionals Congress (an embedded topical at the 2011 ANS Winter Meeting) on the history of severe nuclear accidents.

A primary focus for the YMG is the transfer of knowledge, and this session will provide unique perspectives from individuals involved in the world’s most prominent nuclear events. The lessons learned from these front-line individuals will be invaluable for the new generation of workers in the nuclear power industry.

Before the events at Fukushima in Japan, the most recent severe accident took place more than 25 years ago at Chernobyl, making it reasonable for  younger people to have a slim perspective on the impacts of severe events. In addition, young members may have a limited knowledge of past accidents and certainly won’t have direct personal experience. The panel session at the winter meeting will focus on the lessons learned from Chernobyl and Three Mile Island, and how these events have profoundly shaped our understanding of severe accidents. In particular, this session will also address how these lessons have been applied to the response to Fukushima.

With the help of Alan Levin, of Areva, we are able to bring together notable panelists who will tackle the issues from different perspectives:

  • Michael Corradini (University of Wisconsin, ANS Special Committee on Fukushima and ANS vice president/president-elect) will give a brief summary on the conclusions drawn by the ANS special committee.
  • Masanori Naitoh (Institute of Applied Energy, Japan) will discuss in detail the event sequence at Fukushima, and address the very important question, “Why did such a catastrophe occur, even after the lessons learned from TMI and Chernobyl?”
  • Dana Powers (Sandia National Laboratory) and Joy Rempe (Idaho National Laboratory) will discuss what was learned from TMI and Chernobyl. Powers also will discuss the history of the source term in the TMI accident, while Rempe will address insights from TMI’s accident progression. Rempe’s presentation will include videos related to the events immediately following the accident and the relocated debris and damaged internal structures within the TMI-2 vessel.
  • Brian Sheron (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) will discuss the regulator perspective on severe accidents with a focus on recent events.

We hope that you will attend this session at the 2011 Young Professionals Congress, scheduled in the morning on Tuesday, November 1st, 2011, at the Omni Shoreham hotel in Washington DC.

Merzari

Elia Merzari is the current YMG secretary. He works as a nuclear engineer at Argonne National Laboratory, where his research interests include nuclear thermal-hydraulics, modeling and simulation of nuclear reactors, and accelerator driven systems.
_________

Profiles of Exceptional Women in Nuclear Energy

Editor: Dan Yurman

Nuclear energy, like many other highly technical science and engineering fields, was led in the post World War II era by men. In the decades that followed, many women entered the field. An indication of how much that presence has grown is that the Women in Nuclear (WIN) organization now lists 4,500 members, according to a press release from the Nuclear Energy Institute, which is a sponsoring organization for WIN.

The latest crowd sourced blog post here at ANS Nuclear Cafe is a series of profiles of exceptional women in the nuclear energy field. ANS asked for brief profiles for publication and we are very pleased to present them here.

These are  first person stories, e.g., “How I become a nuclear professional and the importance of what I have achieved” in terms of career satisfaction, work-life balance, career ladders, technical mastery, or meeting a management challenge.

We published these profiles  because we think that they tell interesting stories, and we hope you agree.

________

Susan Hoxie-Key
Nuclear Fuel Services Manager

Southern Nuclear Operating Company

Susan Hoxie-Key

I grew up following the space program and knew by the time that I got to high school that I wanted to study engineering in college. I wanted to be one of the people who knew how complicated things worked and who made complicated things work. The colleges that I was applying to required a choice of major. I literally looked down the list of engineering majors and passed judgment on each option. When I got to “nuclear” on the list, it sounded interesting and hard. I picked nuclear engineering, and have never looked back.

In college, I joined the cooperative education (co-op) program, which meant that I alternated work and school semesters to earn money and gain work experience. Co-op was also a wonderful opportunity to live away from home and school and to test myself in the real world.

In 1989, after 12 years at Savannah River Site, I joined Southern Nuclear as a core designer for the Vogtle 2 nuclear power plant. I worked in core design and fuel-related licensing until 2006, when I moved into nuclear fuel procurement. More recently my responsibilities have expanded to include characterization of burned fuel for dry cask storage, burned fuel inspection activities, and new fuel fabrication oversight—all in addition to fuel procurement.

I love seeing my ideas put into action. I love the idea that I help make electricity, which has such a profoundly positive impact on peoples’ lives.

________

Kate Jackson
Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer

Westinghouse

Kate Jackson

My mother was an English teacher and my father was an engineer. They seldom agreed on politics or religion, but they always agreed on the importance of education and personal values. Growing up, family time was an opportunity to learn and practice open debate, with the most valuable lesson being that I learned to ask really good questions.

I’ve had exceptional opportunities to study and manage large, complex technological and natural systems to understand energy, environmental, and political intersections. These inextricably integrated systems require our continued stewardship and trade-off solutions by our best scientists, engineers, and social scientists.

As a parent, consumer, engineer, and global citizen, it’s important to me that we evaluate all energy options. As science and technology innovations lead us to review new trade-offs, we must continue to question and weigh options. Our social and economic stability depends on a flexible and diverse energy portfolio. Most of my career I’ve advised policy, business, and industry decision makers. And, it’s clear to me that nuclear energy is an essential component of a sustainable, emissions-free energy system.

I’m proud to be part of the Westinghouse tradition of excellence and innovation in science and technology. The AP1000® is the safest and most efficient nuclear reactor ever designed and licensed. In addition, I’m confident that our small modular reactor will offer an equally safe and efficient choice that customers can rely on in an increasingly carbon-regulated world.

I’ve never been one to plot my career path. Instead, I’ve gravitated toward work that makes a lasting contribution to the world that our children will inherit. We’ll never have all the answers, but we have an ethical responsibility to be fearless about asking all the questions.

________

Amanda Maguire
Engineer, LOCA Analysis & Methods

Westinghouse

Amanda Maguire

I arrived at Westinghouse as a new college graduate two years ago. My first days provided an impressive perspective on the level of responsibility available for young engineers in the nuclear industry. With a growing number of engineers approaching retirement age and the rapid changes around new nuclear technology, there are numerous opportunities to learn and advance. My first months at Westinghouse were spent immersing myself in learning about loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) long-term cooling analysis for the entire Westinghouse C-E reactor (Combustion Engineering) fleet of plants. The expectation was that, over time, I would amass enough knowledge to serve as the new subject matter expert.

I was initially overwhelmed by the high expectations of the nuclear industry. Getting up to speed with the volumes of knowledge was no small feat. Most knowledge transfer on older technology occurred in one-on-one information sharing sessions. I spent weeks meeting with previous experts, documenting everything they told me.

Now I feel light-years away from where I started. LOCA long-term cooling analysis is a current Nuclear Regulatory Commission focus. As a result, I’ve faced several difficult questions from the staff. I’ve learned to rely on my peers and other resources because an accurate answer is more important than an immediate answer. The biggest lesson learned, however, is to never try to do everything on your own!

This experience has been highly rewarding. I’ve recently presented in front of the NRC, traveled to several plants, and spoken with customers about my work. Although I’ve only worked in the industry for two years, I can now consider myself a subject matter expert!

________

Kathryn A. McCarthy
Deputy Associate Laboratory Director

for Nuclear Science & Technology

Idaho National Laboratory

Kathryn McCarthy

I was going to major in music. I played clarinet in the Phoenix Youth Symphony and in my high school band. I loved it. But the music programs in high schools were being cut as state budgets were reduced. I’m practical, so I considered other options. I had grown up around engineers and scientists. My father was a chemical engineer and worked at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for many years. I was good at math and science, and I enjoyed it. So I decided to look into engineering, which was a good combination of math, science, and practicality.

My high school physics teacher would often talk about nuclear energy. It sounded interesting, so I decided to major in nuclear engineering. I received my B.S. in nuclear engineering from the University of Arizona (where I had a wonderful mentor in Norman Hillberry, one of the designers of the first nuclear reactor, Chicago Pile), and my M.S. and Ph.D. in nuclear engineering from the University of California, Los Angeles. My area of research was fusion energy. Research in fission was limited then, and fusion energy had lots of interesting research options.

After graduate school, I worked for six months at the Kernforschungszentrum, Karlsruhe, research institution in Germany and then for a year in the Soviet Union, before coming to the Idaho National Laboratory, where I’ve worked for 20 years, first in fusion and then in fission technology.

My husband of 25 years is one of the main reasons that I’m successful. He’s an engineer with a Ph.D., and he has always been supportive of my career. We’ve raised two wonderful boys (my most important job), and I’ve been able to balance work and family most of the time.

My current role at INL is Deputy Associate Laboratory Director for Nuclear Science and Technology, where I’m responsible for the execution of about $250 million worth of research and development programs.

I miss playing clarinet, but began taking piano lessons several years ago, so I still have my foot in that door, too.

________

Gail H. Marcus
Former President, American Nuclear Society

Gail Marcus

Whenever I talk to students about careers, I always tell them that careers are like snowflakes—no two are alike. Even if someone goes to the same university or takes the same first job, the landscape changes over time, and a second person can never follow the identical path.

Therefore, I tell them not to put too much emphasis on a career model. Instead, I emphasize the value of broad skills, diverse experiences, flexibility, and networking. And of how volunteering in one’s professional society can help career progression.

When I first joined ANS, I really didn’t have any expectation of getting involved in Society governance. But ANS ticked me off by issuing a pink badge, used for spouses, to my husband (really!), and then one thing led to another.

At some point, I realized that being involved in Society activities was benefiting me in many ways. Early in my career, it gave me opportunities to learn and exercise skills I later applied in my workplace. Throughout my career, it also gave me a chance to get to know many people outside my own field and my own organization.

If this sounds like an ad for ANS, so be it. The opportunities within ANS are numerous and diverse, so there is something for almost every interest. I encourage every member of ANS, but particularly the younger members, to get involved. Volunteering in ANS will not lead everyone to the same path I followed, but it will almost certainly prove a valuable experience.

As for me, I always wonder how my career would have evolved if ANS had not handed my husband a pink badge. In retrospect, I guess I’m grateful they did.

________

Kelle Barfield
Vice President, Advocacy

Entergy Corporation

Kelle Barfield

Kelle Barfield says that she became a nuclear professional through first
receiving an undergrad degree in journalism from the University of Texas, a graduate degree in communications management from Syracuse University, and
by working in the publishing world in Manhattan and Birmingham, Ala. But all
roads led her home, back to her roots in Vicksburg, Miss., where she married
an engineer who worked in nuclear at Entergy’s nearby Grand Gulf Nuclear
Station.

Beginning her Entergy career 25 years ago as a technical editor at Grand
Gulf, Barfield has successfully navigated the organization chart from
nuclear to utility positions back to nuclear, giving her a unique breadth
and competency in the nuclear sector. Leading national efforts and
considered a respected, knowledgeable thought-leader, Barfield’s passion for
the nuclear industry is noteworthy.

When Toni Beck was hired by Entergy as a new corporate communications group vice president at the New Orleans headquarters, she saw the opportunity to weave Entergy’s nuclear advocacy efforts into the broader public awareness that Entergy tries to instill about all aspects of energy policy.

Barfield is now shaping a new position created at Entergy: Vice President for Advocacy Communications. With bold thinking for the corporate giant, Beck is
leveraging Barfield’s management and industry expertise, moving her from the
nuclear headquarters in Jackson, Miss., to the New Orleans office
overlooking the Louisiana Superdome.

Barfield commented that the shape of the Superdome reminds her of a short,
fat cooling tower. “Once a nuke, always a nuke,” she remarked as she
packed boxes for her new office. This nuke isn’t going too far, only
up.

________

Michaele (Mikey) Brady Raap, Ph.D.
Chief Engineer,
Battelle Northwest Division
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
ANS Treasurer and Chairman of the Professional Divisions Committee

Michaele Brady Raap

How does a kid (especially a girl) who attended high school in the same small Texas town that her mother grew up in end up with a PhD in nuclear engineering and an officer of an 11,000 member organization like the American Nuclear Society?

I often wonder myself, how did I get here? Most of my family (still in rural Texas) think I’m stubborn enough to do anything, but they wonder what DO I do?

In high school, I wrote a research paper on nuclear power. It was totally awe inspiring to think of the amount of energy that is released from something you couldn’t even see. After all the work (grades, testing, essay writing, etc.) associated with applying for colleges and scholarships (my only option for college), I decided I should be pursuing something that really excited me…so I checked a box that said “nuclear engineering.” I spent my first four years of college trying to figure out exactly what an engineer was!

By the time I finished my B.S., we were just getting to the good stuff. I stayed for my M.S., which included spending time at the university’s TRIGA reactor, and then for my PhD, which culminated in a three-year graduate research opportunity at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Wow, was I a long way from home!

I found a lot of support in my early involvement in ANS—both as a student and as a professional. That experience gave me confidence and provided opportunities for me to grow as a professional. ANS was also where I learned that nuclear is so much more than an academic study, a lab experiment, or electricity generation. It’s a powerful science with applications in medicine, space exploration, agriculture, food processing, etc. There are endless opportunities to support and improve current applications and to identify new uses of nuclear science and technology. For many developing countries, nuclear is the option that most effectively enables them to increase the standard of living for the masses.

After more than 25 years, I’m still jazzed by the potential of nuclear and thankful that I have the opportunity everyday to learn something new.

________

End Notes

The editors at ANS would like to thank these contributors for sharing their stories with our readers. We hope that you find them inspiring.

# # #

Old tactics, new approaches

Vermont Yankee’s opponents continue their campaign

by Howard Shaffer

Entergy and the state of Vermont are locked in a lawsuit regarding the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant. Opponents and  supporters of Vermont Yankee both have tried to influence legislators to see their points of view by writing letters to the editors, lobbying, and (in the case of opponents) demonstrating and holding rallies. Now that there is the case in the courts over keeping Vermont Yankee operating, how have the tactics changed? First, we must understand the situation.

The lawsuit

Entergy bought Vermont Yankee in 2002 and signed a Memorandum of Understanding, under which Entergy agreed that it would require a Certificate of Public Good from the state’s Public Service Board to continue operating the plant past 2012. Then, in 2006, the Vermont legislature passed Act 160, which gave the state a right to refuse to allow Vermont Yankee to operate (even though, subsequently in March of this year, the plant received its 20-year license extension from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission). The state’s stance toward the plant is the subject of a lawsuit filed by Entergy.

Opponents have charged that Entergy agreed to Act 160, which effectively is a change to the conditions of the MOU. Entergy, however, never signed on to any change. Other charges against Vermont Yankee repeat a standard litany: that the plant is unsafe, unneeded, and unreliable. Opponents never have a problem with spouting out unreliable claims, even as the plant operates continuously for 500-day-plus runs. Yet the opponents exclaim, for example, that the plant is on the brink of disaster when a safety-related steam trap leaks.

The injunction

Entergy filed for a federal court injunction to block the state from taking any action to shut down the plant while the case is in court. (The suit and injunction are superbly discussed in this “Yes Vermont Yankee” blog post.)

The Federal District Court for Vermont in June held a  two-day hearing on the injunction, in Brattleboro. This is the heart of anti-Vermont Yankee country, so a demonstration was assured. Sure enough, a demonstration was held.  (Also reported in Yes Vermont Yankee, with pictures.)

The court denied the injunction, but the Entergy board of directors made the decision anyway to order fuel and continue to operate the plant, with a refueling outage scheduled for this coming October. (Read more about the injunction here.) And, as a professor at the Vermont Law School said in the school’s blog, the court’s decision appears to indicate that the state has an uphill battle.

The future

It is generally assumed that this case will g0 all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. There is some comfort to be taken in the fact that Vermont has lost its last two (non-nuclear) cases before the court, both of them recent. The latest case, involving the use of prescription drug sales information, drew a comment from one of the justices that the Vermont legislature has to stop “targeting industries that it doesn’t like.” This sounds to me like what the legislature has been doing with Vermont Yankee.

Trying new approaches 

Plant opponents and the state government. On August 3, two stories about Vermont Yankee appeared in the news. The first reported that the state had billed Entergy for court costs for the lawsuit over the plant’s continued operation. The second reported that strontium-90 was found in the edible flesh of a fish in the Connecticut River, upstream of the plant.

The billing of court costs is done under a new law passed by the legislature, after Entergy filed its suit. The public discussion has pointed out, however, that court costs are usually determined after a suit is settled. In addition, the new law targets Vermont Yankee specifically. This sounds like what the Supreme Court justice had in mind about the state of Vermont putting a bullseye on its opponent.

Before the fish story reached the media, Gov. Peter Shumlin sent a letter to Vermont Yankee, essentially blaming the plant for the Sr-90. The opponents have always used the tactic of blaming everything radioactive, or unusual (such as the birth of a two-headed calf), on the plant. This is the first time that a Vermont governor has done it, however.

Plant advocates. At the June court hearing on the injunction, there was an anti-Vermont Yankee demonstration outside the courthouse. To counter it, Meredith Angwin (who also writes “View From Vermont posts) and I showed up with pro-Vermont Yankee signs. We approached reporters and told them our story. We were successful in having the pro-nuclear side of the story covered in the next days newspapers.

"No Nukes Hattie"

"No Nukes Hattie" in her no nukes car.

Other things happening: There was a Facebook group (Save Vermont Yankee) that was not associated with the plant, but for which Meredith and I served as administrators. Facebook recently changed the way groups are run, and will soon “archive” that group. The Energy Education Project (EEP) that Meredith heads, however, started a new Save Vermont Yankee page. Meredith and I are administrators again, and a summer intern, Cavan Stone (a Dartmouth graduate student), constructed the page. The new “Save Vermont Yankee” page has many friends. Please “like” it!

Also, the EEP formed a letter-writing group, whose members critique each other’s letters before submission to various publications. There are other letter-writing groups that are pro-nuclear, too. Please join one.

In addition, the EEP is targeting media this summer, after a vigorous winter and spring campaign of speaking events at Rotary Clubs and other places. Meredith and I have also been on several local TV and radio shows.

And, community access TV in Vermont has accepted recordings of our debates and a PowerPoint presentation with voiceover to replay during various times.

Defusing opposition. I tried a new tactic when invited to give a presentation on nuclear power to a “Great Decisions” group, in  New London, N.H. The group’s programs are an hour and a half long with a break, allowing for sufficient time for dialogue. I suggested to the host/moderator that only a short introduction be used, about 10 minutes, to lay out issues, while allowing the rest of the time for questions. This was enthusiastically accepted and it worked out well.

My introduction was begun by saying that I would follow the format of a familiar church service, which begins with a confession of sins. It was stated that the nuclear power industry has made mistakes and had not apologized well for them. Acknowledgement of mistakes led to pointing out that the entire industry is designed on the belief that, with people involved, there will be mistakes. That is the reason plants have containments: human error (which includes management, design, and everything that goes into the mix) will eventually create the worst case, as happened at Fukushima.

Later, a follow-up call to the host/moderator found that the introduction was effective in defusing possible hostility from the audience, which he had been warned about when the program was first publicized. This approach should work again for other audiences.

Outlook

We expect more of the same old tactics, and new ones, from the opponents. We will continue to use approaches that have proved successful, and try new ones, as we are doing this summer.

The latest polls in Vermont show 45 percent in favor of Vermont Yankee, 41 percent opposed. Progress has been and will continue to be made.

Howard Shaffer has been an ANS member for 35 years. He has contributed to ASME and ANS Standards committees, ANS committees, national meeting staffs, and his local section, and was the 2001 ANS Congressional Fellow. He is a current member of the ANS Public Information Committee and consults in nuclear public outreach. He is coordinator for the Vermont Pilot Project.

Shaffer holds a BSEE from Duke University and an MSNE from MIT. He is a regular contributor to the ANS Nuclear Cafe.

ANS welcomes three new student sections

The American Nuclear Society‘s Board of Directors on June 30 during the ANS Annual Conference in Hollywood, Fla., approved the creation of three new student sections:

Each new section went through an established process to become an official ANS affiliate. “When a school decides they want to form a student section of ANS, they fill out a petition and submit it to the Student Sections Committee,” explained Rachel Slaybaugh, SSC chair. “The petition contains information such as the activities they’ve done so far, what the nuclear program is like at their school and other information about the department, and what process they’re using to become an official student section (electing officers, reviewing bylaws and rules, etc.).” The SSC reviews the petitions and makes recommendations.

“The Student Sections Committee made the recommendation at the June meeting to endorse these sections to the Board of Directors, which proceeded to vote unanimously in favor of approval,” said William Sames, a member and Web master of the ANS National Student Sections Committee, and the 2011–2013 student member of the ANS Board of Directors. Mentoring partnerships consisting of new and established student sections are encouraged, and the Texas A&M section will be working with the UT–Arlington section in this regard. The three new sections bring the total number of active ANS student sections to 44.

The ANS Nuclear Cafe recently caught up with the faculty advisers for each of the three new ANS student sections to learn more about what’s happening with them.

City College of New York

Professor Masahiro Kawaji is the faculty advisory for CCNY.

Kawaji

Having a student section of ANS at CCNY will benefit our students in many ways. First, they will be able to organize and sponsor nuclear engineering-related events for the members, other students, faculty, and guests with full support of the university. They will be able to use the facilities on campus such as the meeting and lecture rooms for these events, which include seminars by guest speakers invited from industry, academia and government agencies, and social events for the students, faculty, and guests from outside CCNY.

The student section will also be able to organize field trips to nuclear power plants, national laboratories, and industrial research and development centers. The section leadership will be encouraged to send some of the members to attend ANS-sponsored meetings and student conferences, so that they will have a chance to meet with nuclear energy (NE) professionals from industry and academia, as well as students from other universities. Previously, all of these activities were organized and handled by the faculty adviser, but now the student section can take the leadership and initiate and expand these NE-related activities.

The Grove School of Engineering at CCNY

The vision is to become the center of student-led activities related to nuclear engineering in New York City and the surrounding area, and provide the student members with an opportunity to interact more with the NE professionals in industry (utilities, suppliers, consulting companies, research centers, and government labs such as Brookhaven National Laboratory). In the future, the student section will also be encouraged to work with the ANS New York Metropolitan section to organize an event for NE professionals in the New York area to get together with the student members at CCNY. We will also expand the student membership to include graduate students, and secure an office with a phone and Internet connection so that the members will be able to better communicate with outside organizations.

Virginia Commonwealth University

Professor Sama Bilbao y León is the faculty adviser for VCU.

Bilbao y León

I think that a student section will help energize the students and will also help channel that energy in positive directions. Even though we have a lot of diversity in nuclear  in Virginia, having access to all the resources provided by ANS and being exposed to the U.S. and international nuclear scene provides even greater opportunities to our students. A student section will help the students develop a sense of community and belonging, and to establish stronger ties among the nuclear students within VCU and with other  universities. As a faculty, there is nothing better than having enthusiastic and motivated students.

As nuclear engineering program director (particularly in a program as new as ours), I also welcome the feedback and the ideas our students bring to me when they interact with other nuclear students, and of course, any enhancements we can make in our program will directly revert upon our students.

VCU nuclear engineering students (from left) Jeremy Dunay, Thu Ho, Josh Bell, John Deng, Nelson Lopez, and Daniel Daroy

At this point VCU–ANS is focusing in two main areas: Professional Development (PD), and Public Information (PI) and Outreach. PD is a key area for the VCU student section because our program has been focused on nuclear power, so the students feel that it is very important for them to learn about all the other areas of nuclear science and technology. PI is one of the key focus areas for many student sections, and young people tend to be very effective communicators. Thus, our students have quite a few ideas about how to spread the good news about nuclear in our community.

University of Texas–Arlington

Professor Rasool Kenarangui is the faculty adviser for UT–Arlington.

Kenarangui

Having an ANS student section here at UT–Arlington can provide an opportunity for each student member to participate in various ANS activities such as listening to inviting guest speakers, attending organizing field trips and social events, and volunteering in outreach program and public awareness events. Through these activities, members can enhance their leadership and professional skills, as well as their future careers. In addition, each member can benefit from receiving and reading Nuclear News magazine and ANS News, having access to ANS’s career center, and receiving various discounts on ANS conferences, books, and technical journals.

UT–Arlington is in close proximity to the Comanche Peak nuclear power plant and the Region IV Office of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and there have been indications by some entities to build more new nuclear power plants in this area. In addition, there are a number of small companies in the area that provide services and consultation to these entities. Beginning in fall 2009, the College of Engineering at UT–Arlington began to offer a new undergraduate minor in nuclear engineering.

In this process, there is a great deal of potential for an ANS student section at UT–Arlington to play a major role in advocating the benefit and importance of nuclear energy and introducing advances and new developments in nuclear science and engineering to students on campus and in high schools and to the technical community and technical professionals through organizing seminars and participating in summer camps and workshop activities. At the same time, ANS students will introduce ANS to the non-member students, discuss the benefits of ANS membership, and establish a collaborative relations with other ANS student chapters—in particular, the Texas A&M chapter—to visit and have joint meetings.

____________________