The weekly Carnival is the collective voice of blogs by many of the Internet’s foremost nuclear experts and advocates, who continue each week to tell the story of nuclear energy around the World Wide Web.
If you want to hear the voice of the nuclear renaissance, the Carnival of Nuclear Energy Blogs is where to find it.
This week’s Carnival
Hearing on disposal of surplus weapons-grade plutonium via MOX fuel caused a stir in Chattanooga.
Wading into the “nuclear zombie” horde
Steve Skutnik at The Neutron Economy posts a “nuclear zombie” survival guide prior to the Chattanooga hearing on disposing of surplus weapons-grade plutonium in MOX fuel, including the most important rule: always remember the double tap (especially for certain “zombie” arguments that just won’t die).
Mixing it up over MOX – a wrapup of from Chattanooga
Following the dust-up in Chattanooga over the use of surplus plutonium for use in MOX fuel, Steve Skutnik gives his account of the meeting highlights, including some of the more specious arguments employed by opponents. Despite the no-show of “nuclear zombies,” there was plenty of necromancy at work with respect to some of the arguments being made against destroying plutonium in MOX fuel.
Plutonium Power for the People
Rod Adams at Atomic Insights writes that one of the biggest threats to the continued wealth and power held by the global fossil fuel industry is a “plutonium economy” fueled by abundant resources of uranium that can be converted into fissile plutonium.
The anti-plutonium propaganda machine has successfully delayed the implementation of extensive breeder reactor programs by several decades.
Today, this propaganda machine continues working to stoke fears of plutonium, because the material is still a threat to the prosperity of the fossil fuel industry. Instead of using former weapons material in conventional reactors in the form of mixed oxide (MOX) fuel, people opposed to the use of plutonium would prefer this valuable, energy-dense material to be encapsulated into glass logs and buried deep into the earth’s crust, where even our smarter future generations might have trouble getting to it.
After all, the law of supply and demand tells suppliers that they can make more money when supply is tight; that situation drives prices higher to levels well above the cost of production.
Aquatic life and thermal discharge were a focus at Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant
The River and the Rhetoric–Who Speaks for the River
Meredith Angwin at Yes Vermont Yankee describes the Connecticut River Watershed Council. This advocacy group claims that the shad in the Connecticut River are decimated by hot water from Vermont Yankee. One of their soundbytes: “A bad neighbor bakes your wildlife.”
The River, the Shad and the Water Permits describes the record shad run on the Connecticut River this year (one million fish!). The post includes a video clip of Arnie Gundersen saying that there are only 16 shad in the river.
Plant Cooling a Stumbling Block? At the ANS Nuclear Cafe, Howard Shaffer writes that several nuclear power plants are facing challenges concerning water discharge temperatures and the potential for effects on aquatic life.
At Vermont Yankee, as at several other plants, heat rejection includes cooling towers, as well as a river. Opponents use the plant’s thermal discharge as a way to attempt to shut down the plant, or alternately, to harass the plant into unnecessary and expensive use of its cooling towers in all weather. Howard Shaffer considers water issues at Vermont Yankee, and how they are distorted by the plant opponents.
Nothing to see here… no, really
No Need to Fret About UT-Austin’s TRIGA Reactor, No Matter What Drudge Might Point To
Eric McErlain at NEI Nuclear Notes wrote on Friday that, in spite of a screaming headline at the Drudge Report about a nuclear reactor evacuation (actually, the UT research reactor is securely located over 10 miles north of campus)… there really was… “nothing to see here.”
Climate Change and Nuclear Energy
Is climate change a business opportunity for the nuclear industry?
Suzy Hobbs Baker at the ANS Nuclear Cafe notes that climate science has very important implications for nuclear science.
She writes that the nuclear industry has an opportunity to expand its business by helping to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, support sustainable growth, and create high paying jobs — or as innovative billionaire Sir Richard Branson says, “Doing good is good for business.”
Likewise, she argues that showing lukewarm concern for climate change is bad for the planet, and bad for the nuclear business.
World Nuclear Association and Nuclear Energy Institute
A New Head for the World Nuclear Association
Gail Marcus’ at Nuke Power Talk discusses the recent appointment of Agneta Rising as the new Director-General of the World Nuclear Association (WNA). She is to replace John Ritch in this position as of January 1, 2013. Gail notes the critical role that John Ritch played in making the WNA the important and influential force it is today in the global nuclear community, and summarizes the outstanding background that Agneta Rising brings to the position. Although Gail considers John’s performance a tough act to follow, she concludes that Agneta has the capability to continue and further develop the important work of the WNA.
The Need for Multifaceted Energy
Also at Nuke Power Talk, Gail Marcus covers a recent opinion piece by Marvin Fertel, president and CEO of the Nuclear Energy Institute. Now, you might think that someone from NEI would be focusing only on nuclear power, but Fertel points out the need for a multi-faceted energy strategy that includes conservation, efficiency, and a spectrum of energy technologies ranging from fossil to nuclear and renewable energy sources. Gail endorses this position and applauds the head of NEI for taking it.
Fukushima Accident Updates
Leslie Corrice at The Hiroshima Syndrome compiles the Internet’s top source of Fukushima accident updates.
September 15: “Fukushima’s waste water decontamination system is a success story”
Fukushima Daiichi’s “makeshift” waste water decontamination system gets critical news coverage every time it has problem. However, there have been no Japanese news stories about the system’s overall unquestionable success. The waste waters remaining in the plant basements are 20 times less radioactive than a year ago. For a “makeshift” technology… it’s doing a great job.
September 10: “America’s Gundersen profits on Japan’s fears”
For the past several weeks, America’s preeminent prophet of nuclear energy doom has been touring Japan. Arnie Gundersen says that Fukushima Daiichi is an accident still-in-progress, with the greatest potential for disaster being the spent fuel pool (SFP) of unit #4. Gundersen’s prolific panderings have precious little real-world evidence to support them, but the Japanese Press and many politicians treat him as an expert voice to be reckoned with. Preaching that Nuclear Judgment Day is an ongoing possibility has become a lucrative endeavor.
South Korea’s Nuclear Energy Program
Will Davis at Atomic Power Review presents an entirely fresh discussion on the essentials of South Korea’s nuclear energy program. Using materials from the Korean nuclear industry and from Korean press, he fills in the details on the important entities, dates and events in the development of PWR technology in South Korea. If you’ve wondered how this nation so quickly progressed to the point where it can beat all bidders in the UAE’s Barakah nuclear plant program, this article is for you.
Nuclear Waste Disposal
Nuclear Waste Disposal in the Permian Basin
Robert Hayes at Science and Technology writes that the Permian Basin (comprising southeast New Mexico and West Texas) is having something of a revival in nuclear technology — from the uranium enrichment plant in Eunice NM, to the soon to come International Isotopes facility, and possibly a monitored retrievable storage site to be built west of Hobbs, New Mexico.
Nuclear waste disposal is one industry already found in the area, including the disposal portions of Waste Control Specialists and the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.
Brayton Cycle Supercritical Engine
Brian Wang at Next Big Future writes that Sandia National Laboratories is seeking an industry partner to market a turbine system that could substantially improve energy efficiency in small modular nuclear reactors.
A supercritical CO2 Brayton-cycle system can reach 50 percent conversion efficiency. Typically, one only gets 30 percent conversion with an [air-based] steam engine. The system is much less expensive to build because it’s very compact, says Sandia’s Gary Rochau. Given its size, it can’t be used in large power plants like coal-fired generators. But it’s well-suited for tiny plants, such as small modular nuclear reactors. A molten salt test pump was recently installed.
The publication of the Carnival each week is part of a commitment by the leading pro-nuclear bloggers in North America to speak with a collective voice on the issue of the value of nuclear energy.
While we each have our own points of view, we agree that the promise of peaceful uses of the atom remains viable in our own time and for the future.
Past editions of the carnival have been hosted at Yes Vermont Yankee, Atomic Power Review, ANS Nuclear Cafe, Idaho Samizdat, NEI Nuclear Notes, Next Big Future, and CoolHandNuke, as well as several other popular nuclear energy blogs.
If you have a pro-nuclear energy blog and would like to host an edition of the carnival, please contact Brain Wang at Next Big Future to get on the rotation.
This is a great collaborative effort that deserves your support. Please post a Tweet, a Facebook entry, or a link on your Web site or blog to support the carnival.
# # #